It was only about 20 minutes, but Alberto Nuñez Feijoo He gave more than encouragement to the members of Congress; he inspired them. The “enthusiasm” for the “roundness” of his speech was reflected even more in the comments in the corridors of WhatsApp chats than in the long applause after his speech.
“Today was an important day.”the leader explained in the parliament courtyard.
“Today, the defendant’s prosecutor declares that you have been exposed. plumber Suggesting the President… The boss managed to hold things together with a number of phrases explaining the outrageousness of the situation, but still… I have time to make suggestions”.
In fact, there were very few rhetorical concessions in Feijaw’s speech, with each paragraph, each phrase, and each word functioning as follows: cluster bomb amount For Pedro Sanchez, it’s all that and more against president.
Because that’s all.
Not everything was a dialectical attack: the PP leadership managed Grab headlines with bold initiativesone of the things that scratches the vote. he took it out of VAT relief in the housing sector (“installment payment”) Because we know that this is the first concern of the Spanish people and that this idea goes directly to their pockets. he left the president ironing.
Mr. Sanchez listened from his blue seat, sometimes smiling, sometimes looking overwhelmed. First, when Feijo destroyed his ego. When you ask, “Has it already been explained what happens there?” international summit To those who don’t invite him. ”
Second, when dismantled his argument When the EU talks about housing because of him: “Hey, listen to the European Commission. interventionist policy This will have a negative impact on price declines. ”
And finally, Describing it as “inherently dishonest”. “The most serious thing you stole from the Spaniards was stole their future”.
“There will be no amnesty.”
But one of the keys was launching a series of nine questions on corruption, which Sanchez could not hope to answer with rebuttals, but at least create an interesting catalog of signs. “There will be no amnesty.”he promised, the day PP would arrive in Moncloa.
1. “Did you call a businessman asking for sponsorship for your wife?”
Feijot questioned the “legality” of the company. Begoña Gomez Moncloa translates one of the crimes she is accused of, the crime of influence peddling, into easy-to-understand language.
The question pointed to a network of sponsorships for Sánchez’s wife’s special professorship at the University of Complutense. Companies that benefit from contracts and assistance your government’s
2. “Can you confirm that your major campaigns are legally funded and that your father-in-law is not involved?”
The PP already asked the Chief Executive about this matter on October 30th when he attended a meeting. Cordes Commission The Senate…and that is moment of greatest tension of Sanchez. The PSOE manager himself questioned the legality of funding the current president’s campaign.
However, the framework for this question is modus operandi The circumstances surrounding him are said to have begun at that time and are today the subject of a judicial investigation regarding: “Illegal financing” and “money laundering” In PSOE, Supreme Court and National Courts.
3. “Mr. Sanchez, do you already know where your brother lives? Look carefully at all the rooms in Moncloa. Don’t let him stay there.”
The popular president made a teasing hint about his presidential brother staying overnight. david sanchez He would have been “hidden” in Moncloa while officially living there. PortugalIn theory, you can pay less tax while working. badajozhe stands to stand trial soon.
Feijoo offered it as an example of how Sanchez would use it. “Public resource” For the benefit of their immediate environment, without the slightest concern or “institutional respect”.
4. “Do you know why your political party paid in 500 euro notes when, as you say, the banks only gave them 50 euro notes?”
The question asks: contradiction In the explanation of PSOE’s financing through cash payments investigated.
Feijó pointed out that the “500 euro banknote” was never officially used in Feras because it facilitated opaque transactions. own Mr. Kold questioned the president’s position.EL ESPAÑOL, regarding his party’s financial developments: “I received more from the PSOE than the UCO said. Some of it I received in big bills because no one wanted it.”
5. “Do you already know who Kordo is or is this still an “anecdote”?
3 people “Peugeot Gang” They executed the next burst. Mr. Feijot asked about Mr. Avalos’ former adviser who was allegedly involved in a corruption conspiracy. Sanchez defends the relationship as merely “anecdotal” and denies it in his book. resistance manual Or by some photos published by this newspaper.
his tone was clear playful disbelief The president doesn’t know who is so important to the scandal surrounding his government.
6. “Do you already know whether Santos Cerdan is still a ‘proper socialist’?”
When the president appeared before the Senate about two weeks ago, the most common answer he used was “I don’t know.” Therefore, the game of the leader of the PP with the expression of spoiling it with sarcasm when asking questions Ethical cleanliness of Sanchez and his “imprisoned” organizational secretary.
The question was an attempt to keep Mr. Sánchez in the seat, and his government and party believe this is the case. “To the bottom” amidst a corruption scandal being investigated.
7. “Do you know if anyone said anything to you before you fired ‘solid’ Avalos?”
The use of the adjective “solid” made a mockery of that very description. former number 2 The socialist indicted today, Sánchez himself, did something similar. Even after seeing him involved in a corrupt conspiracy.
Not in either Cordes Commission Sanchez said his direct collaborators Adriana Lastra and Carmen Calbothey warned him about the former minister’s “dissolute lifestyle.” carolina pearlswho was his wife at the time.
8. “So why did I put it back on the list after two years?”
However, the president could not answer that day why he had “reacted so quickly” to the allegations and later reinstated Ábalos to second place in Valencia. I also met with him to talk about Cordo before the incident broke out, and he confessed as follows: he overlooked his political ability.
This question implies the following complete lack of consistency The move is said to be part of Sanchez’s fight against corruption.
9. “Mr. Sánchez, are you also the president of the Sewers? Do you seriously have nothing to say about ‘plumber’ Leyre Díez’s claims that she worked for him? Is this the ‘cleansing’ you were trying to bring to Spanish politics?”
Mr. Feijo concluded with a sweeping question, summarizing all the corruption scandals uncovered in the government and its environment under the “total sweep” he commissioned. plumber Rayle Diezallegedly an employee of Ferrers Sewerage.
Existence of a coordination system for extrajudicial operations within the PSOE Looking for “dirty laundry” The punishment of prosecutors, judges, journalists, and even police officers is currently being decided in court.
And Feijoo finished sarcastically by questioning how Sanchez could do that. Declare a political “cleansing” if you are involved As “number one” in all these extortion accusations.
About The Author
