The process of evaluating a judge’s conduct juliet mackintuck This Wednesday, we held a short but intense public hearing characterized by a very tense atmosphere. Statement from Gianinna Maradonadaughter of diego armando maradonaHe expressed his disappointment with the judge who was suspended. Accused of abuse of power and poor performance, judge goes to trial on suspicion of participating in documentary filming divine justice On trial.
The hearing will be held in an annex to the La Plata Senate Chamber, and 11 jurors will have to find out: If a judge is sanctioned or removed. Gianinna appeared in court as a witness and was visibly moved, saying: “We just wanted to know the truth about our father’s death.” I didn’t want to stop the trial.”.
In addition to the former soccer player’s daughters, this Wednesday’s hearing also included other relevant testimony. Among them is that of José Arnal, partner of the production company La Dobre, who is responsible for the documentary. Partner of Juan “El Chavo” D’Emilio, a writer and close judge. and Maria Lia Alemán, Makintuck’s childhood friend and one of the promoters of the project.
Authoritarians don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That is why it bothers those who believe that they are the owners of the truth.
Mr Maradona’s youngest daughter has described the “disappointment” she felt when she learned that a documentary was being made while her father’s death was being investigated. divine justiceProbably with Mackintuck’s support. “I contacted her, but all I asked her about was the documentary. he denied that they were filming. I believed in her as a woman. I wanted to die after seeing it all” he said during his trial testimony before the suspended judge.
At the end of her testimony, the youngest of the 10 daughters asked: Honoring my father’s memory “I asked the prosecutor not to show me the photo of my dead father, but I don’t understand why someone would let me see that,” he said, reflecting on the painful episode. He also reaffirmed his desire for justice, saying, “The only thing I want is for the truth to get to the bottom and for those who have to pay the price to pay the price.”
What does Julietta Mackintuck say in her statement?
Judge’s impeachment trial centers on her alleged involvement in documentary divine justicetaken during the judicial proceedings over the death of Diego Armando Maradona. Through a story that focuses on the judge’s gaze, this production was questioned as representing an unwarranted interference in a trial in which the public was extremely interested, and led to the invalidation of oral arguments due to the alleged impact on the fairness of the court.
On this stage he denied Direct interference in the production of documentaries And he was adamant that he never knew his script or the details of its content. She explained that the suggestion came from a friend who asked her to interview him about his personal life and career within the judiciary. “I never thought this would affect me in any way. I went into court and never spoke to anyone again.” he declared in front of the jury.
Furthermore, he claimed that There was no secret operation And that his actions were always transparent. According to their interpretation, members of the court had known about the existence of this project since within a certain group. whatsapp A message about this recording was shared. “My colleagues knew about this documentary,” he said, calling the controversy a “misjudgment” and “media mockery” against him.
Maradona case: MacIntouch accuses Savarino of ‘aggravated false testimony’
In his defense, Mackintuck argued that: Victim of unbalanced processwas driven by interests outside the cause, and reiterated that his argument was that: the only purpose is “Seeking the truth” in the file About Maradona’s death. She also accused her colleague Maximiliano Savarino of “false testimony” for linking her to an alleged attempt to cover up misconduct surrounding the filming and production of the documentary.
Supported by her interpretation of the facts, the judge’s defense seeks to prove that there was no malice or breach of duty, but rather a misunderstanding of her actions.
MV
L.T.
About The Author
