The Civil and Criminal Court of the Basque High Court (TSJPV) approved the following convictions: 6 years imprisonment imposed on a man Charged with raping a woman he hired to clean. your home … Biscay. This judgment, handed down by the state court last May, has become final in all terms as the defendant’s defense appeal was dismissed.
In its resolution, TSJPV dismantles the main arguments raised by the convicts, who have argued that the victim’s story was “disjointed” and that the complaint was responsive to allegations. “Great value mobile”. Both claims were dismissed, and the judgment was No fake interest He said the woman’s version of events was “chronologically logical” and “completely consistent with the objective tests” carried out during the process.
The court recalled that the victim’s testimony was consistent with the following: medical reportThe police report and the Comprehensive Forensic Evaluation Unit (UVFI) conclusions strengthen its credibility; Eliminating the hypothesis of false complaints.
Prison sentence and compensation of 50,000 euros
The incident dates back to January 24, 2022. On that day, the woman went to the defendant’s house to perform cleaning work within the framework of a previously agreed employment relationship. As the Visayas court established, the man sexually assaulted her. The court of first instance found that the victim Did not consent to sexual contact at any time and argued that the defendant acted under a situation of domination and submission created by the defendant.
In addition to the prison term, the court imposed six years of supervised release on the convicts to be served after completing their sentences and a requirement to participate in a sex education program. compensation must also be paid 50,000 euros to the victim Regarding psychological damages and other complementary measures of protection and compensation.
The TSJPV has now confirmed all these provisions, stressing in particular that judicial responses to sexual offenses must be “firm and proportionate”. Trust or Dependency between the victim and the perpetrator. This judgment, which remains appealable before the Supreme Court and the Court of Cassation, reinforces the policy of jurisprudence to strengthen the credibility of victims’ testimonies, as long as they are supported by objective factors.
About The Author
