We are waiting to see if Judge Jose Ignacio Villaplana will make any decision in the case. In the case of Para de Gines After learning of the intermediary suspicion of Rafael PinedaHe was the chief of staff. government delegation … Andalusia Until August 31st to support a socialist mayor Romualdo GarridoWhat is certain is that the application of two principles will determine the future of the case after the public prosecutor’s office does not indict the defendant and only public accusations remain.
One year has passed since the investigative judge indicted Romualdo Garrido, the former first mayor and nine members of the various municipal levels, the municipality’s technical architect, the auditor, the managers of several beneficiary groups, and other municipal administrators. Four former brothers of the Rossio Brotherhood, Last September, after eight years of investigation, the public prosecutor’s office requested the closure of the case, stating that the crimes investigated were not justified, including administrative misconduct, embezzlement of public funds, fraud and illegal enforcement, urban planning fraud, document falsification, and influence peddling.
Despite the accusation that Popular groups of the Seville Regional Parliament It accused the mayor and 16 others of prior misconduct and called for Garrido’s disqualification. instead, 2 former Imagine City Council membersalso carry out popular prosecutions and demand prison.
In its document, the Ministry of Public Affairs opens the possibility for lecturers to apply famous accusations, since only general accusations are left to carry out the accusations. “The Doctrine of Spoils” This prevents an oral trial from being held against someone only if requested by a public accuser.
The name originates from a court case against the former president of Banco Santander. In application of Article 782.1 of criminal procedure lawprovides that if neither the public prosecutor’s office nor the private prosecutor intends to proceed with a criminal case, the public’s action is limited to doing so.
In this sense, the Court has indicated that said Article 782(1) is the crux of the issue under discussion.If the prosecutor’s office and the individual accuser request that the case be dismissed, the judge will agree.» However, except in certain cases.
However, the Supreme Court itself, later validated by the Constitutional Court, raised the following against the Botin doctrine: “Atucha” doctrine, It points out that in crimes affecting “collectively owned property, diffuse or ultra-individual nature”, popular prosecutors have the right to continue proceedings. It remains to be seen what decision the judge who brought the sweeping indictment against the mayor and the remaining defendants a year ago will make.
About The Author
