The human body is interesting. Álvaro García Ortiz ostentatiously raises his right eyebrow when he believes he is very right, more than usual or when he is seriously emphasizing an issue, or when he feels attacked and needs to explain why (“flashy” is the word in his rehabilitation from the dark ages). This is great to see Written by Jesús Gil). Her eyebrows are not symmetrical, but each eyebrow on the right side has its own personality, and she has followed her own path since childhood. During Garcia Ortiz’s cross-examination by the defense, there is a language of her own that we are interested in deciphering (she refused to respond to accusations of “dishonesty”, the latter whispered between her eyebrows). After all, in reality, you never know which eyebrow won’t listen, one will raise on its own, or the other will not feel like raising. There are many such things in this trial. Zakobe Casas once wrote, “The birds thought they were flying, but they fell into the sky.”
By the way, there is a historical connection between progressivism and eyebrows, and half of the people who supported Zapatero in 2004 by making eyebrows with their fingers either had their eyebrows shaved or had their fingers amputated.
After the testimony of UCO officials, State Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz testified. In its report, the Civil Guard published a conversation between Diego Villafañe, FGE’s right-hand man, and Pilar Rodríguez, the chief prosecutor of the state of Madrid, as indicative of a leak by the state attorney general. UCO said Ms. Villafañe suggested that there was a larger plan to award professional awards to everyone involved in the prosecutor’s office’s alleged conspiracy. “I already said we’re going to need you a lot, so take care of yourself,” he tells her. She replies: “Oh, what are you thinking?” And Villafañe says, “Everything is fine.” This is a typical conversation taught to find out whether a patient is obsessed with sex or obsessed with power. UCO chose power. However, Garcia-Ortiz’s defense team revealed part of the conversation, which was a bit frustrating. “On Monday, I saw another ophthalmologist. He prescribed a different type of laser, one that is more penetrating and specialized for exfoliation, and is even more painful. What I note is that I was at Laser Vision several months ago and he did not see any new tears,” says the prosecutor. And Villafañe: “Oyster, I didn’t know about the new tears. Stay strong and take care of yourself. We need you to be at your best!!! A big kiss.” “Lasers won’t stop you from doing your job!” she says. “Hahaha. What kind of person are you! I already told you that we need you very much, so you should take care of yourself.”
Notice the number of exclamation points in “We need you the most.” The eyebrows I know are showing signs of that and I have to take a taxi to look for it. If your colleague tells you that he needs you completely after a tedious eye surgery, you’ll probably think that he wants to stage a coup. But that this disconnected conversation served as a sign of a conspiracy paradoxically explains another sign, which is even more unfortunate. When asked why the conversation was cut off, investigators said it was to protect the privacy of witnesses. And it also protects Laservision’s reputation a little bit.
The acceptance of statements ends this Wednesday. A trial has not yet been held, and even if a verdict is issued, there will be no trial. A trial that begins with a clear verdict in each person’s head never ends, especially if there is political affection. UCO, like Miguel Ángel Rodriguez, believes that everything that happens in the state attorney general’s office is “controlled” by the prosecutors themselves. This is a generous and ill-advised thesis, especially when prosecutors tried to steal information that the state attorney’s office also had access to the leaked emails. That means the chatty neighbor on the eighth floor, who always talks about seasonal fruit in the elevator, likely received the document from González Amador’s lawyers two months before it reached the attorney general. And it’s unopened. That’s why the only conclusion of this trial is that this document could have reached people who didn’t even have email, people who might have received it in a crowbar. The fact that FGE was indicted is because someone has to sit there and we are not going to sit the Ourense woman who has to show her face.
García Ortiz ended her statement with a suitably blushing endorsement: “Someone I don’t know just told me on the way here.” “The truth is not filtered, it is protected.” Similar to Fabio Capello’s phrase. Perhaps Capello was talking on the phone with Sacchi after leaving the Mallorcan pastry shop on Calle Genoa, and the prosecutor may have thought Capello was telling him that. lastly. Of course the truth will continue to leak out. FGE did not frown at that moment, perhaps because he himself was not convinced. You don’t cut your hair the night before a party or change the way you speak on the way to court. Who knows if MAR in a wig didn’t say that?
About The Author
