a society of mistrustnew essay victoria campthere is an explosion of the power of philosophical analysis that directly challenges a society characterized by loneliness and apathy. In this book, the author examines how extreme individualism has undermined trust in institutions, others, and ourselves, and denounces the confusion between autonomy and isolation, freedom and irresponsibility.
a society of mistrust
e-book
Camps’s text explores the following criticisms: neoliberalismdeconstructs the idea that independence constitutes the highest virtue. The Catalan philosopher argues that reducing freedom to the exercise of pure selfishness does not represent true freedom. Based on this premise, Camps (a Spanish philosopher and professor born in Barcelona in 1941) points out that the root of the general mistrust that characterizes modern society is a worsening individualism. The proliferation of verification mechanisms such as fact checkers is a symptom of this crisis. Once trust is lost, everything has to be proven.
Over 216 pages, the author takes us on an intellectual journey: bioethics to educationpassing through aging and political communication. His argument is supported by a series of references, including: aristotle, Han Byung Chul, cant and michael sandelHowever, avoid falling into academicism and keep your prose clear and approachable. Camps claims “philosopher’s courtesy.” ortega y gassetshould be present in public discussion, but today there is very little of it.
One of the most notable aspects of this essay is that libertarianism Camps describes it as a distortion of the liberal tradition. According to the authors, this trend reduces positive freedom, the ability to build a meaningful life, to negative freedom, understood as the possibility of unlimited action unless discovered. In this context, Camps points out that the left’s abandonment of redistributive policies has facilitated the rise of populism, which promises community in exchange for exclusion.
In the article country, Mariam Martinez Bascunyan I defined this work as “orA book you need: “In an age where noise and communication, opinion and thought, are confused, Camps reminds us that philosophizing remains an act of resistance. Or, as Prometheus says in its final pages, perhaps the problem is not giving humans freedom, but rather that humans have not learned to exercise their freedom as responsible moral autonomy.”
Although the author suggests that recognition policies have been replaced by redistributive policies, he recognizes that the two are not incompatible, but rather question their priorities. Camps said: “Material equality is the most important requirement, and once it is achieved all kinds of discriminatory differences disappear.”. However, there is a problem with this line of thinking. Because it assumes that it is possible to achieve material equality without simultaneously addressing the cultural structures that perpetuate inequality. Proposing an “inclusive identity framed in a common human identity” can lead to universals that create invisible differences that require special attention.
Thus, racialized domestic workers do not first experience economic discrimination and then cultural discrimination, but rather both forms of oppression co-occur and mutually reinforce each other. The low pay of these workers is directly linked to stereotypes about women, immigration, and care work, and any attempt to prioritize these aspects becomes artificial. Discrimination functions as an integrative structure in which materiality and culture are always intertwined.
This tension is highlighted when Camps defends the importance of being “close to the people” while simultaneously criticizing identities that make visible those who have been historically marginalized. A paradox therefore arises in which recognition of human interdependence is called for, but the recognition of certain forms of dependence and vulnerability is called into question.
Despite these nuances, Camps’ intellectual project retains its strength. This book serves as a mirror reflecting the contradictions of today’s society. Individualism is practiced while community is coveted, transparency is demanded and surveillance is shunned, leadership is demanded and authority is despised. Camps avoids offering simple solutions and instead shifts the burden of consideration back to the reader. “The classic moral question: What should I do?”
About The Author
