In this year 2025, central barracks He was participating in an arbitration dispute. Every weekend, the decisions of the men in black and their technical assistants were scrutinized. As a result, as in other cases, good looking He benefited more than he was harmed. This balance is a huge plus for the Tapia team, which will play the “final” on Monday. hurricanemay qualify. south american cup. For some reason – are you afraid of making mistakes? anxiety? – Referees think about a play many times before resolving it Barracas, the club where AFA president Claudio Tapia started his career at the top. This refereeing “system” will include members who are well known to fans of the Baraka team even before the Grove match.
Andres Galliano He will be the referee. This is what he will do in that match One of the four referees who acted the most “guapo” during the seasonthere will be 4 meetings. Others include Nicolas Lamolina, Dario Herrera, and Nicolas Ramirez. Between the two sides, 50% of the matches (16 matches) will be accounted for. tapia team – Ivan on the field, Mattias at the club, Claudio “Chiqui” at AFA – 2025.
The rest of the refereeing team for this momentous match against the Globe consists of other Baracas regular members: Assistant 1; Javier DelbarbaThis will be his seventh time as a manager this year (4 as assistant 1, 2 as assistant 2, the rest as VAR assistant): the team for which he has provided the most assists. In both cases, the attendance record belongs to Attendee 2. walter ferreira This will be his eighth appearance in a Baracas game this season. Like Del Barba, the players from Barracas have been the most prolific players on the field this year.
Jose Antonio Carreraswill audit the play at Ezeiza and be in charge of VAR. And it will be the fifth time this year that he has done so in a match against the Barakka team as the protagonist. Same with Lucas Novelli and Adrian Franklin. In other words, the Tapia team will be hosting some of the referees who have been in charge the most during the season for the most important match in recent history, with a ticket to the Copa Sudamericana at stake. Almost my own dream team in black. And extra fact: he is undefeated with Galliano as referee (1-1 against Belgrano in the Apertura and Clausura, 3-1 against Banfield in this Clausura as a visitor).
Pirata fans and their coach Ricardo Zielinski do not have good memories of Gagliano, who has to apply the regulations in the match between Barakas and Globo. On the 10th day of the current Clausura, at the request of VAR duo Adrian Franklin and Brian Ferreira, Nicolas “Uvita” Fernandes’ rare goal was disallowed Franco Jara’s alleged past violations. The match ended 1-1 and the striker gushed on TyC Sports: “I scored a great goal! Didn’t you see the goal I scored? They can’t annul it. I wanted to continue the winning streak, but it’s broken. What am I going to do? These are decisions. The truth is, you want to say it all.”
Born in Bariloche and settled in Rosario, Gagliano started off as a referee in the Totoras League, then in the Federation Council, where he combined competition with physical education coaching. Federico Beligoi, the national referee director, promoted him to the winner of the Diego Armando Maradona Cup at the end of 2020. And in 2025, he just made it international. Galliano wears FIFA shield In his uniform.
Nicolas Lamolina didn’t have as much luck as Gagliano at Barracas Central. Until the 12th day of the Clausura, he was the only Argentine football referee to have coached Guapo four times in a year. but, hasn’t appeared again since. Additionally, he was absent from the schedule for a week before returning to VAR. No one wants to talk about it in public, but it’s a lesson learned. what happened? “Pancho” Lamolina’s son took charge of the postponed match against Boca in Olavarria and Luna. and He committed a bold act: – correctly – expel Ivan Tapiason of Barakas’ captain “Tiki” and brother of club president Matthias.
Whether it was the referee’s fault or the VAR assistant’s fault, Baracas has scored 14 points so far this season. like he said nationUntil the match against Estudiantes de la Plata, they had scored nine more points due to a mistake by the referee. Since then, Barracas have lost at home to Boca (1-3), drawn against Tigre (2-2), won against Argentinos (2-0) and drawn against Union de Santa Fe (0-0).
All matches had controversial plays, but ended with a balance in favor of the Barracks team. Elias Cabrera’s mistaken sending off in the first half left Tigre with one player less. That play affected the outcome more than the fact that the Matadors tied it at the end. All things being equal, history could have been different. El Guapo felt like they lost two points. Technically speaking, one of them won.
The following weekend, Barracas hosted the Argentinos at the refurbished Claudio “Chiqui” Tapia, and it was a game filled with all sorts of bad tricks. The AFA could have scheduled the Argentina Cup final for the week of the 10th of November, but chose to hold it the week of the 3rd. reason? Before competing for the title against Cordoba’s Independiente Rivadavia, Bicho was competing against the Clausura… Barracas Central. So, He went to Olavaria and Luna with his substitutes. And he lost in a duel with a thousand argumentsdirected by Andres Merlos. La Paternal’s team suffered an unfair red card for Claudio Bravo in the 21st minute of the first half. Then coach Nicolas Diez saw the red and was the only player on the paternal team who had the courage to at least protest something to the referee. As the match ended 1-0 in favor of Guapo, no clear penalty was awarded. Barakas then won a match that could have been a draw.
The latest chain of failures featuring Barracas occurred last weekend in Santa Fe. El Guapo visited Union and the referee, Dario Herrera, did not give a red for a strong infringement on Valentin Fasendini by Rafael Barrios, nor did he award a penalty for a collision between goalkeepers Marcelo Minho and Franco Fragapane. Both plays at least deserved a review. Forum was sent off due to a VAR decision, and Guapo left the stadium on April 15 with one point.
The five units gained in the last three days, in addition to the nine points that Barracas Central had already earned according to LA NACION research, give Rubén Dario Insúa’s team a total of 14 points more in the year’s ranking than their performance on the field deserves. Therefore, instead of their current 48 points, they should be level on 34 points, the same as Sarmiento, who just avoided relegation to Banfield, Atlético Tucuman and Primera Nacional. And it was just one unit ahead of Talleres, Newells and Instituto, which also lost the category.
This year, the controversy over Guapo began in February, leading up to the second leg of the Apertura tournament. Baracas defeated Banfield 1-0 at Arsenal Stadium, where they played at home earlier this year. The only goal of the game was scored by Kevin Jappert after an obvious play up front. However, the referee Luis Lobo MedinaVAR, under the watchful eye of Fabrizio Llobet, also found no obvious offside.
It didn’t take long for controversy to resurface in favor of the team, chaired by Txiki’s son Matias Tapia. On February 15, Mr. Guapo visited the National Defense and Judiciary for his sixth date. In stoppage time, referee Dario Herrera awarded a penalty in favor of the visitors after Gonzalo Morales fell in the area. The play was apparently not strong enough to constitute an infringement, but VAR intervention by Hector Paletta was decisive. El Jalcon, who deserved to take the three points, were hurt by a decision that was difficult to justify.
Later, Barakas received Newell’s on February 24th. That summer afternoon, during a 2-0 home victory, there were at least four controversy over leprosy. Referee Pablo Echavarria first disallowed a clear penalty by Jonathan Luck in the Barracas area when the match was only 1-0 due to the presence of Txiki Tapia in the box at the Arsenal Stadium.
Already in Clausura, the first major controversy occurred on the fourth day of the Clausura 2025 tournament. Barracas defeated Aldosibi 3-1. That afternoon, August 10, Guapo started winning by scoring goals from questionable positions. And the line drawn by VAR to show it was valid caused even more confusion.
Another recent match was on the closing date 11 and the loser was Estudiantes. It all happened in a 1-1 draw in La Plata. Pinxa won, but in the play before the equalizer there was clear contact between attackers Facundo Bruela and Facundo Rodriguez in a scramble for the ball. This left the Estudiantes defender sitting on the floor and in considerable pain. Nazareno Arraza had no fouls and Barracas reached the tie.
About The Author
