The scandal was about to explode. An investigation into a documentary that purportedly purported to convey the details of a trial, in which it attempted to determine whether a person was criminally responsible for his or her death. diego armando maradona The review moved forward with the excellent participation of Judge Julietta Mackintuck. But the judge denied it in front of his court colleague Maximiliano Savarino, who was in charge of the argument, and the judge. Veronica di Tommaso.
“I take responsibility for my naivety and misplaced good intentions. This is a wake-up call for me from now on. I believe I can learn from this, and I’m sure I will! I ask you to rest.”Judge Mackintuck wrote last Saturday, May 17th at 1:14 p.m. In a WhatsApp group called Juicio DAM (by Diego Armando Maradona) she shared with Savarino and Di Tommaso.
A few minutes earlier, Savarino had written: “I’m very upset. What you’re asking for is a proper oral trial. Have a nice weekend.”
Two days ago, an investigation into the alleged documentary was launched following a complaint filed by a lawyer. fernando burland and mario broudirepresentative of Dharma and giannina maradonaand Veronica Ojedarespectively. That day, during the hearing, Maria Lea Aleman (a close friend of Mackintuck’s) and Juan Manuel D’Emilio were publicly identified and later identified as the screenwriter. divine justiceas the documentary was named.
According to a chat he had access to on Monday, the 19th. nationMackintuck wrote a letter to a colleague at 10:47 a.m. “Good morning. If I’m free, I’ll go.”
But the response they sent said his colleague was busy. Di Tommaso was on trial, and Savarino was being sentenced by debate.
The exchange of messages began early on May 20, a key hearing in Mr. Maradona’s annulled trial. “Good morning. I understand that you are upset and upset about the issues that concern me. But I have done nothing wrong. I am not selling documentaries, I have no operations or contracts with production companies, and there are no crimes that they are deliberately ascribing to me to smear the scene. Of course they are all negotiating behind the scenes, because justice, legality, and truth are of no importance to them at all,” McIntuck wrote at 7:15 p.m.
Mr Mackintuck’s WhatsApp message continued. The chat sent by the judge at 7:18 a.m. said, “I apologize again. I hope that you will be considerate of me as a colleague and protect the legitimacy of the debate between the three of us.”
At one point, Ms. Mackintuck told a colleague that she was meeting with Rafael Sal Lasulli, a former Guarantees judge in San Isidro, who advised her not to make excuses. “I wish you would listen,” he asked. Mr. Di Tommaso responded: “I don’t think that’s necessary at the moment. I also think it’s okay to consult with everyone who I think could be a reference.For now, I’m just waiting for the next few days to pass.” i prefer to be cautious“Savarino agreed.
On that day, at the customer’s request, Patricio Ferrari, one of the Attorney Generals of San Isidrothe trial was suspended for a week to learn the progress of the criminal case surrounding the documentary. Prosecutor Cecilia Chayeb, Carolina Asprela and Jose Amaro.
At 5:20 p.m. on May 21, when the trial was adjourned, Mackintuck wrote to the group: “I regret it immensely. But I can’t go back in time. So I have to defend myself with confidence that I committed no crime and that this charge is not grounds for recusal. If you’re going to remove a judge because of the charge, let them choose who will be the judge.”.
Six minutes later, Mr. Savarino sent the following message: “I think it would be best to meet on Monday. Tomorrow I have to devote myself to other matters. Besides, next Tuesday (the day the suspension of debates ends) there will be a reading of the judgment of the one-man trial. It seems prudent to wait until Monday to meet.”
“I agree with Mr. Maxi. There is nothing new in this case at the moment. Let’s wait and see what happens these days,” Di Tommaso wrote.
At 5:40 p.m., Mackintuck sent another chat: “I’m sorry you’re going through this because of me! I have a lot to learn (and I hope I get a chance to prove it). See you on Monday. Looking forward to the news.”
On Saturday, May 24th, the judge sitting in the courtroom sent the following message to his fellow judges: link from memo nation Where documents submitted by her friend “La Negra” Alemán in the criminal case are mentioned, where she denies making the documentary, and where she says: “It was just an interview in her role as a woman and a judge.”.
And in the next message he wrote at 12:02, he added: “I know we’re scheduled to meet on Monday, but I’d like to give you news of the criminal case and why I won’t accept the recusal.” We are very sorry. There’s not enough life to apologize for causing all this. I hope the debate and institutions withstand this attack. ”
On Sunday, May 25th, the messages began before dawn. Makintuck was sent to WhatsApp group 2 link Notes from Clarín from Infobae. One of the titles announced that Maradona’s family intends to push for a political trial against her.
And at 6:30 he sent an email that said: “I’m sorry. I can’t sleep. This idea of a political trial is not just for me, but for you as well, and it shows the need for the three of us to come together to solve this problem together. As a court, we can handle this. I assure you, please give me that opportunity. They are forcing us to withdraw from the trial, and they are trying to nullify the trial at all costs. I swear to you that you are not guilty of any crime,” or that there is a jury or grounds for dismissal, and that the trial can proceed as normal in the deliberation chamber. But there is no other solution than the three of us working together to solve this problem. They can get together today. There is an urgent need to stop this nonsense.”.
At 9:59 there was another message from Mackintuck. “It would be sound and far-sighted for us to meet to decide what position the court will take. I am ready to go to the place you tell me at the time you specify.” And in another sentence he added: “There is no crime, there is no injustice.”.
At 10:10, Di Tommaso said: “I saw this last night (about the jury recommended by Maradona’s family). It’s a real infamy because neither Maximiliano nor I did anything questionable. I am absent due to personal reasons. Plus, I’m not going to do anything that goes against my spirit. My only concern today is to have time to clarify things. I responded carefully. that’s all i want to say”.
Eight minutes later, Mackintuck wrote: “Thank you for your reply. All (capital letters are the original of the message) are true infamy. Also, I have not committed any questionable acts. I just agreed in good faith to answer the view (how ironic!). There were no promises, privileges, influence, benefits, money, production company, anything irregular that could constitute a crime. And after the first day, the shooting was “.
Mr. Mackintuck continued. “Tomorrow, please, come together to define the situation. We cannot improvise in the face of the obvious coercive and defamatory mechanisms that are widespread. We must bring Maradona’s death and the impartiality of the court to the forefront of the discussion. That’s what everyone seems to have forgotten. The last thing I want to say is, I won’t bother you anymore. The only solution to all this public ridicule is to believe it and keep talking.”The spotlight will return to Maradona and the trial will proceed as usual. If the judiciary gives us that possibility, there is still much work to be done. ”
Mr. Savarino and Mr. Di Tommaso did not respond until Monday. “Good morning. I’m in court. When I’m done, I’ll be leaving for personal reasons,” was the message from the judge. The judge wrote, “I have no intention of meeting with you today. I will have to finalize the text that will be read tomorrow in a one-person oral trial.”
In response to these responses, Mr. Mackintuck said, “I hope that tomorrow they will not be brought to court by dark, malign interests. It is up to all three of us to protect justice and the functioning of the judiciary so that this debate continues to its conclusion. That is what the world expects and deserves. We are sorry that we have given them the opportunity to jeopardize justice.”
Finally, the next day, the prosecutor’s office submitted strong evidence regarding the project. divine justice And after all parties (public and private prosecution and defense challenged Mackintuck), the judges were removed from debate and Savarino and Di Tommaso declared a mistrial..
Today, Mr. Mackintuck faces a jury that could end in his dismissal.
About The Author
