Disagreements over major EU reforms threaten EU executive

Europe’s favorites are aiming this vote in line with promises they made to voters to improve the business environment within the EU. In the first vote last month, a proposal agreed between the People’s Party and the Socialist Party, which forms the political core guaranteeing stability in the EU, was rejected by some Social Democratic MPs who voted against it. As EPP officials admit, “it would mean the collapse of parliament; Perhaps the committee will collapse.

The approval of this legislative package can be seen as part of the recommendations of the former Italian Prime Minister. mario draghi Report on the need to increase the competitiveness of European industry. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz thought so. “!Disaster” It claimed that it was not approved by the plenary session in October because Socialist MPs did not respect voting discipline and expressed frustration when it was presented to the European Council.

Weber tightens the rope

Some media outlets remember that already in May, the publicist of the popular group was also German. manfred weber began to define a pragmatic position on parliamentary arithmetic. “I would like to see a different situation in the European Parliament, but far-right members are here, they have the right to vote, and the EPP has fundamental principles of keeping its promises,” he said, which was interpreted as a veiled threat by socialists and liberals to the pro-European majority.

But that doesn’t happen, at least not intentionally. After the proposals negotiated with socialist groups failed, the EPP independently prepared a series of amendments to relax environmental standards, confident that it would receive clear majority support, without looking at where the votes came from.

Jorgen Warbornthe EPP’s negotiator on the issue explained, “We intend to “offer only our own amendments” that we consider reasonable, and we are confident that together with them we can obtain the necessary majority to quickly begin negotiations with the Council.”

Importantly, these amendments submitted by the populists may be very similar to those submitted by the Conservative Party and Reform Party (ECR). Giorgia MeloniPatriots for Europe (where Vox operates) and Europe of Sovereignnation extremists.

The Socialist Party, the Liberal Party and the Green Party have accused the People’s Party of not negotiating these amendments with the People’s Party, and the answer is that they have not negotiated with anyone, despite publicly declaring, at least from the ECR, that they are in favor of making amendments with the People’s Party.

delay

french Aurore L’ArcThe party, which is a member of the social democratic group and chair of the European Parliament’s Economic and Social Committee (ECON), has defended itself against criticism that blames the socialist group for the delay in approving the package. “The European people are choosing us, whether they like it or not, to do their job,” he says, “and in tripartite negotiations, who has to constantly block progress and who has to constantly consult with the capitals? Well, it’s always the Council. International Trade Commission (INTA) chairman and socialist Bernd Lange says this is due to “serious problems posed by the complexity” of the legislative package.

The stability of European institutions is based on the coexistence within a stable majority of socialists, liberals and populists. However, there is also a clear majority, including the EPP, which includes three far-right groups, known as the “Venezuela majority.” This is because it was imposed when socialists joined the far left to avoid condemnation of the dictatorship that existed in the country. Until now, the EPP has maintained its position of respecting the legislative agreement with the socialists, and has not violated it in this case.

However, in reality, there is a very high possibility that far-right votes will be added to the EPP’s votes in the vote, which risks affecting the stability of the centrist majority.

Danish environmental parliamentarian Kira Marie Peter Hansen As her group’s representative on the issue, she has already warned that it is “shameful that the EPP has closed its doors to any dialogue and has chosen to remain isolated and resentful instead of being part of the solution.”