Andalusian government suspended 2 employees with over 14 years of service Ten months after obtaining a permanent position at the Directorate General, he signed a provisional contract at the Andalusian Employment Service (SAE). he … The reason is that they simultaneously submitted to two merit-based contests called by the Board to stabilize temporary employment and chose two different positions, which, in their opinion, amounts to a violation of the provisions of the Andalusian Civil Service Law. This is stated in the resolution of September 21, 2025. Objected by one of the employment promoters – The other affected party is also preparing a similar case – whereby the Directorate General for Resources and Public Functions of the Council annulls the appointment and terminates the employment relationship with both employment promoters.
According to the rules invoked by the board in its resolution, “the same applicant Participate in the selective process for temporary employment stabilization called» Under the protection of the above-mentioned law, “it is not possible to be offered the position of a career civil servant or permanent worker in more than one organization, profession or specialty, both in the executive branch of the Andalusian government and in the institutions that constitute the Andalusian public sector.”
After the plaintiff attended the SAE selection process for Group II VI Convention workers and obtained the place; She signed a contract conversion to a permanent member of the team. At the same time, in order to secure at least one slot, it was waiting for a resolution on a separate selection process for Group II intermediate degree graduates of the Board Directorate, who had also applied.
he applied for leave
The Department of Public Functions assures that “alarms went off” when workers erected the workers. I applied for leave at the Fuengirola employment office. (Malaga) informed that SAE had given him the award. The board denies that. Not only that, but her first permanent appointment was also revoked and she was excluded from the second selection process. She claims that days before becoming a permanent employee, she signed a responsible declaration that she has not been appointed to another institution, specialty or category. The plaintiff alleges that He chooses SAE surgery and reveals he doesn’t have it all This is because she had not yet been appointed by a public authority.
The board understands that Committed “falsehood” by failing to report that he had entered another contest And, as the Andalucía Advisory Committee indicated, the ex-officio review of the appointment was archived without any complaints being dealt with. The reason was that, as the Andalusian Consultative Committee had shown, it was not an administrative law, but rather a labor law, so it could not resort to the contentious administrative route and could not rely on the social courts.
Despite choosing the two-way process and obtaining permanent employment, she is now laid off and is not entitled to compensation. has been influenced, suffer from disabilities due to visual limitationshad been providing its services since April 2011 at the Las Lonjas employment office in the capital of Córdoba. Another employment promoter, who has been on SAE’s payroll since 2008 and previously received a permanent disability pension due to cancer treatment, also had his employment relationship with the board terminated for the same reason.
Lawyers represent both parties; Francisco Manuel Sanchez Blancasfiled the first lawsuit on October 7, demanding a preventive suspension of the resolution annuling his appointment, the retention of his office, and compensation of 80,772.80 euros, alleging that the regime had “blatantly” violated Article 4 of the Spanish Constitution and caused damage and loss. As he points out, it leads to:Fraud due to abuse of rights due to misuse of power».
They won a lawsuit against the board in 2015.
The lawyer argues that their firings have a “retaliatory bias” because the companies affected by this situation alone have filed more than 15 lawsuits against the administration. The Social Chamber of the Seville-based Andalusian High Court already deemed their dismissal invalid in January 2015, after the previous PSOE government forced them to re-enter the SAE. Pay processing salary from termination date in 2012. Still, he points out that Cerfs’ program for managing the board’s human resources “never” linked the two to the Sixth Convention on Workers. The Ministry denies any persecution and declares: Plaintiff didn’t know he was going to trial.
Labor lawyers warn in a 50-page complaint that the workers’ contracts were terminated “without motive, without hearing procedures, and without compliance with the most basic aspects of administrative resolutions.” «In addition to being an unconstitutional decision, it also prevents access; If a worker presents himself to two parallel stabilization processes, one of which ends before the other, for a position with no more legitimacy than “I said so,” the provisions of the civil service law that have been invoked cannot be applied. The issue of “speed” of the staff in charge of the process» he explains.
Lawyers believe the outcome of the process is “absurd, irregular and illegal”. And he compares this to the bond process SAE handled to dismiss 23 unqualified workers who had been on the payroll for more than 15 years, 22 of whom were connected to the defunct Faffe Foundation. “Anyone who has met the requirements and earned the position in good faith will be terminated without cause. Applying for two positions at the same time while other workers are protected Appointed by the Board of Directors despite not meeting the qualification requirements for the position being held and permitted to continue in that position while those positions are unfilled. “The world turned upside down,” he laments.
About The Author
