Amid high expectations, a popular juror is selected for a murder trial. Cecilia Strzyzowski Deliberations resumed in Chaco this morning, with a verdict expected to be handed down later that day to decide whether the seven defendants will be found guilty. caesar sennaex-partners of victims and alleged perpetrators. his parents, Emerenciano Senna and Marcela Acuña;Similarly Griselda Reynoso, Fabiana González, Gustavo Obregon, Gustavo Melgarejo.
The resolution was scheduled to be announced before 8 p.m. on friday. However, the court failed to arrive at a definition; We have decided to take a break and continue deliberations until Saturday morning today.
“In complex cases like this, where there are so many defendants, witnesses, and verdict options, it is normal for arguments to be lengthy,” a judicial source explained.
Yesterday, on the final day of the trial, Technical Judge Dolly Fernandez read out to the jury what had happened, the different verdict options for each defendant and the characteristics of each. Deliberations by the popular jury then began.
According to the stipulations, the people’s court is supposed to take at least two hours to deliberate and issue a result.. “The jury’s verdict must be unanimous,” the judge said. However, given the complexity of the case, the expectations and the number of defendants, the decision took longer than expected and was postponed until today.
The trial concluded after almost two weeks of testimony, presentation of physical evidence, and hearing disagreements between the prosecution, prosecution, and defense in general court.
At the argument stage, the court prosecutor: Juan Martin Bogado It sought the conviction of the main defendants. He focused on the rivalry between Cecilia and Sena and claimed there was a deliberate ploy to manipulate and deceive the victims.
In his words, The young woman “believed she would be happy with Cesar Sena,” but “unfortunately, she crossed paths with the wrong people.”. Prosecutors reconstructed the circumstances of the violence and the victim’s final days based on messages, testimony and expertise.
The defense always tried to distance itself from the accusations. Emerenciano denied all responsibility, telling the jury: “I had nothing to do with it.” Additionally, he spoke about his social background and the origins of the region that bears his name.
However, Acuña admitted that she was trying to protect her son and that she acted “like a mother”, but reiterated her innocence of the crime. Yesterday, a few hours before the verdict, Requested intervention from Chaco judicial authorities He also denounced political manipulation in the incident.
“As for the cause, I also wanted to tell you that even if I am accused, I am committed to continue fighting for all my colleagues who are out of work, all my colleagues who do not have food at home today. Also for the judicial authorities of Chaco to intervene against the disaster they have caused in this case, but I hope it does not feel like jurisprudence,” the Piquetero leader said.
All the defendants were tried in the People’s Court, and the defendants had the opportunity to say their last words. caesar senna chose to remain silent until the process ends. It is they who must speak now.
Cesar Mario Alejandro SenaCecilia’s ex-partner is charged with murder, aggravated by their relationship, and with being the perpetrator, a crime committed in the context of gender violence.
your parents, Emerenciano Sena and Marcela Veronica Acuñais charged with murder, doubly aggravated by relationship, and with crimes committed in the context of gender violence as a principal participant.
Fabiana Cecilia Gonzalez, Jose Gustavo Obregon, Gustavo Melgarejo and Griselda Lucia Reynoso are in the dock on charges of aggravated concealment.
About The Author
