The Ciudad Real District Court sentenced the father as follows: continue paying I will pay alimony to my daughter until that is over. Study art and piano in Valencia. It also stipulates that the mother must continue to receive a compensatory pension because she does not have sufficient income herself.
This judicial dispute began when the father and ex-husband first obtained the garnishment of these pensions, claiming a lack of relationship with their daughter and redressing the ex-wife’s financial imbalance. According to the appellate judgment, there is no evidence that: breakdown of family relationships That responsibility lies exclusively and properly with this young woman who is currently immersed in her university studies and is not financially independent.
The court also found that the wife’s employment and financial situation had not changed sufficiently to negate compensation, as she received a salary of just €450 in precarious work.
The marriage ended with a divorce decree issued by a court in Puertollano on March 31, 2014. During that hearing, both parties verbally accepted various financial and personal measures. The father accepted the promise of payment. 350 euros per month His wife at the time was paid a compensatory pension of 100 euros per month, plus alimony for each of their two children.
The agreement specified that the daughter would receive that assistance. while continuing training and that he himself did not have the means to survive, and that his ex-wife’s pension would be terminated only for very specific reasons.
Over the years, the relationship between parents, and also the relationship between father and daughter it was complicated and difficult It followed a flurry of judicial proceedings and charges, including a criminal conviction against the father of the family in 2017. In 2022, the man urged changes to the agreed measures, first of all claiming the lack of an exclusive and culpable relationship on the part of the daughter and demanding the termination of both the pension and compensation. And the economic motivation for the latter has disappeared.
The first sentence, handed down in December 2024, is I accepted those reasons and canceled both benefits.. However, following the mother’s appeal and the intervention of the prosecutor’s office, the district court reconsidered the evidence and background. In its resolution, the chamber emphasizes that there is no written regulatory agreement and that it does not apply given the lack of significant improvement in the mother’s employment status or the daughter’s educational completion. There is no well-established legal reason To withdraw a payment originally established.
Finally, both parties were relieved of costs in this appeal. As detailed in the judgment, this judgment can be appealed to the Supreme Court within 20 days.
About The Author
