Before Gen Z’s dissatisfaction with social and political issues emerged (generation z), there was a relatively recent precedent for this movement in 2012. #yosoi132 Because both are often mentioned in conversations about youth activities. However, both concepts represent very different phenomena in origin, scope, and motivation.
One was a population group with its own cultural characteristics, and the other was an ephemeral student social movement that erupted at a critical moment in the country.
Generation Z (young people born approximately between 1997 and 2012) is the first fully digital generation. They grew up with social networks, hyper-connectivity, and instant access to information that shaped the way they consumed news, interacted, and participated in social activities.
His activism emerged a few days ago in opposition to various levels of government before the presidential election. murder mayor’s Uruapan, Carlos Manzo Last November 2nd.
For this generation, technology is not an additional tool. It is a natural space where public sensibilities are organized, expressed and debated.
The first mass mobilization took place on November 8th to visibly demand safety, justice, accountability, and consequences for the Manzo case.
In response to great response from citizens, Organizers called for nationwide demonstrations To draw attention to the fact that although peaceful methods have not achieved results in terms of security.

#YoSoy132 is a student movement that arose during the 2012 presidential election. The impetus was a protest by students. Ibero-American University against Enrique Peña Nieto And the media reaction that tried to disqualify them for having fewer than 132 students.
The movement has revived by championing media democratization, electoral transparency, and freedom of expression. Unlike Gen Z, #YoSoy132 had a specific political purpose and a defined lifespan. It arose as an immediate reaction to the electoral context and faded after the election.
From an organizational point of view, both phenomena use social networks, but #YoSoy132 focuses on in-person rallies, mass marches, and the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), National Institute of Technology (IPN), among others.

Another important difference is their identity. #YoSoy132 was a movement, not a generation. Participants were primarily from private and public universities in urban areas. In fact, they jumped from there. Antonio Attorini Murra and Genaro Lozanoboth spokespeople, one from the Autonomous Polytechnic University of Mexico (ITAM) and later supported the fourth transformation, and he became a local representative in 2015. state of coahuila.
second movement and After that, I worked as an analyst at Televisa. until you arrive as Ambassador of Mexico to Italyas proposed by the president. claudia sheinbaum.
Gen Z, on the other hand, covers a broader social spectrum and has very diverse economic, educational, and security realities. Some say that right-wing opponents are behind the movement..
Though separated by time and nature, both represent something unchanging. It is the strength of young people to question official discourse, demand change, and use available technology to influence public debate.