PSOE’s theory is that there is no illegal lending and that the “victim” is the party involved. Most Sancistas and some critics repeat it.
National Court Judge Ismael Moreno decided to investigate possible fraud in PSOE’s financing after discovering payments in envelopes to former ministers. Jose Luis Avalos.
Feras isn’t worried about this move right now. Feras alleges that all of that cash was an alibi for the former head of the organization to launder money. This strategy is “incompatible” with “informal financing.”
”The victim is PSOE.”a person who has superiority over the general secretary writes the text in private.
In recent weeks, there has been a belief within the PSOE that Avalos and Koldo: You can also register fake tickets.or accepting cash that is not yours.
After learning of the image of the envelope received by Cordo and Avalos, which the UCO certified in one of its reports, the PSOE linked it to party expenses and said that if it was a bonus, as can be seen in the snapshot, there would be no penny left.
“Everything looks like that money laundering activities” and that they “hope” nothing happens in the key federations. box B.
Despite the conviction that they are victims, the party leadership does not intend to prosecute José Luis Ábalos. At least not for now. “You’ll see that in the procedure,” the executive said, sliding into a forward kick.
On the other hand, some baronies believe that the Party should now appear to be in jeopardy.
Justice after money laundering
Justice Leopoldo Puente of the Supreme Court’s Criminal Court also feels that there is a possibility of money laundering lurking in cash payments.
In one of the resolutions, the lecturer explained the lack of control that exists in the PSOE in the payment of compensation for expenses paid, and said that the system does not prevent “cleaning of origins”.
UCO points to ‘undeclared sources of income’ in which Avalos received cash in envelopes from PSOE
The judge is basing his case on some of the cross-examinations he has conducted in recent weeks.
The most revealing statement came from former party chief Mariano Moreno, who admitted there was no way to control the veracity of the spending.
Mr. Leopoldo Puente therefore argued whether it is possible for PSOE officials and workers to hand over tickets and bills that do not belong to them and receive payment for them. Moreno probably slipped.
Other evidence must now be given, including statements from businesswoman Carmen Pano, who claimed to have brought €90,000 in cash to Ferraz’s headquarters.
All these signs noticed by Puente motivated Ismael Moreno to open another document to investigate the origin of the envelope and its use.
Speaking in the Senate, Pedro Sánchez admitted that he had received cash payments “from time to time.” However, these payments may not exceed 1,000 euros and shall always be made “by invoice”.
The President of the Government and the PSOE Secretary-General defended the legality of these operations, stressing that all records are audited and cash payment operations are always carried out in a legitimate and documented manner.
This version stands in contrast to the evidence Justice has, who believes a lack of controls may have facilitated money laundering.
About The Author
