Prior to the jury’s third hearing for juliet mackintuckrevealed that chats were known between the judge and the rest of the court. San Isidro presided over the oral trial regarding the death of Diego Maradona. it is about Maximiliano Savarino and veronica di tomaso Additionally, he must testify before the prosecution jury this Monday.
The message corresponds to one on March 17 last year, during the third hearing of the debate over the Argentine star’s death. The trial ended in scandal due to the production of the documentary “”.divine justice” suggested Mackintuck during the discussion.
Sources of the incidents indicated in infobae So the conversation took place there WhatsApp group shared by three judgescalled “DAM Trial” by diego armando maradona.
Chats you accessed infobaeindicating that his fellow judges were at least aware of the existence of the. The camera that was trying to record her at the hearing.
“Good morning. (Ezekiel) Klass (NDR: Supreme Court reporter) spoke to me. The subject of the camera that July asked mewe have to keep talking and talking about that topic. I’m in court now, please let me know as soon as possible. Let’s make time to get together before tomorrow’s start. If you have permission from the court in July, please let us know, it will not be a lawsuit and the problem will be avoided,” Di Tommaso warned at the beginning of the meeting, around noon.
Mackintuck replied curtly, “Not today.” He added, “If the class has any topics they would like to discuss with me, please write to me.” Just two minutes later, he announced: “I’m ready. I’ve already talked to Ezequiel and you should be available in case he needs anything. In any case, I’m also going to talk to the court to see if everything goes well.”
He turned back to the camera, but quickly asked, “Is there any presentation or trial that we need to attend?” “And for your peace of mind, I would like to add…” so they don’t film you I have no intention of leaking any evidence. But the court doesn’t need anything, but I give the class the formality it needs,” he said.
Mr. Savarino chose at the time to answer questions about the criminal proceedings. “Right now, they have not offered anything. Whatever, we are in touch. Additionally, the notice of defendant (Ricardo) Almiron was incorporated and resolved on Friday, recording that he had received the notice accordingly. ”
Di Tommaso appeared in court again and said, “I’ll see you tomorrow. We’re still in court.”
This case thus added a new element that could be used in favor of judges in cases accused of violation of internal regulations and impartiality in proceedings. The judge maintained that she had not acted in a vacuum and that all decisions were shared and discussed in an internal group with Mr. Savarino and Mr. Di Tomaso.
A jury was formed for McIntuck following an indictment from the Attorney General. Julio Conte Gran, It blamed officials for irregularities in case management, citing a lack of communication regarding the audiovisual recording of the oral trial as one of its claims.
The prosecution jury, made up of representatives from the Buenos Aires Supreme Court, the Attorney General’s Office and members of the state legislature, is currently reviewing testimony and documents in the case, and is assessing the conduct attributed to Mackintuck during the oral proceedings following the Maradona case.
Officials said the hearing could be extended until a decision is made on sanctions, rehabilitation or dismissal of the charges.
About The Author
