Judge Dana requested information from the General Directorate of Valencia regarding an alert system that provides radio and television information to senior officials’ mobile phones. In an order issued on Monday, the magistrate agreed to request a report from the Government House within three days detailing how the alerts sent by Furlong Intelligence SL on October 28 and 29 were received, identifying the receiving equipment and senior officials of the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Home Affairs who “received the alerts via company or private telephones on the aforesaid dates”. In this way, the lecturer opened up new avenues of investigation following a request for legal proceedings brought by a general complaint by the Valencian Cultural Affairs Agency (ACPV). The group said on November 5 that the presidential administration had introduced a daily warning system for mentions on TV and radio.
Meanwhile, the resolution also requires the Department of Emergency Situations, headed by Juan Carlos Valderrama, to copy daily press documents for the current day and the previous day. It also asks individuals and businesses to detail the list of emails from which they received the press kit. On October 29, 2024, two major newspapers in Valencia began reporting on the Dana prediction.
The judge struck down the same requirement the ACPV had for the Office of the President regarding warnings about mentions on television, radio, and daily press dossier. “Since this implies a direct analysis of the information reception area by the Office of the President, the receiving equipment and personnel of the Office of the President must be excluded and excluded from the investigation,” the order states.
Using former city council member Salome Pradas and former regional emergency director Emilio Argueso as examples, the lecturer will frame the consensus procedures for DANA’s “risk analysis” and the “knowledge” that survey subjects who are “competent in emergency management” may have. Judges have consistently emphasized the role of the media as a “source” of knowledge about risks.